This lab consisted of creating grid-based crime hotspot maps, as well as kernel density and local Moran's I maps. To create my final product, I started with doing a spatial join of the grids and the 2007
burglaries. To create the kernel density map, my parameters were set at cell size 100 and search radius ½ mile, and
processing extent the same as the Grids shapefile, and after excluding all
areas with a density of 0, found my mean density which was 35.16352718. Then I
selected all areas with a density of 105.4905815 (three times the mean) using
the Greater Than tool. For
local Moran’s I, I did a spatial join for the block groups and 2007 burglaries,
then created a field for the crime rate and determined that (#of burglaries / #
of housing units * 1000). Ran the Cluster and Outlier Analysis and created a
polygon for all of the high-high clusters.
Monday, June 29, 2015
Monday, June 22, 2015
GIS 5100 Lab 5
This is the map I created in Part C of the lab, deliverable 11. It compares the spatial accessibility for ACC campuses with and without the Cypress Creek campus. This part of the lab was fairly straightforward, but once it went beyond this it got pretty rough. This map is the result of two Service Area analyses using the Network Analyst extension.
Monday, June 15, 2015
GIS 5100 Lab 4
For this assignment, I placed the second camera on the street corner just north of the original camera, and I changed the offset value to 50, to get a slightly more level view. Then I set the viewing angle to 45 to 90 degrees, to compensate for the shift northward. For the third camera, I placed it on the northeast corner of the next block down, keeping the offset value at 100 since it was slightly farther from the finish line. I set the viewing angle at 180 to 270 degrees to capture the finish line and surrounding areas. Here is a display of my results:
Monday, June 8, 2015
Lab 3 GIS5100
For this assignment, we were to delineate streams and watersheds from a DEM. After working through all of the steps, i.e. filling the sinks, determining flow direction, determining flow accumulation, determining stream order, and determining watersheds from pour points, a comparison was made between these results and the current data for the watersheds and streams of the island.
My results for the stream comparison were a little different from the current data. Some of the streams that were delineated were shorter than the current streams, and some weren't even part of the stream system at all. For the watershed, my result was almost an 8 square kilometer difference. Below is my final product.
My results for the stream comparison were a little different from the current data. Some of the streams that were delineated were shorter than the current streams, and some weren't even part of the stream system at all. For the watershed, my result was almost an 8 square kilometer difference. Below is my final product.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)